Agentic Assurance Snapshot
A bounded baseline for an early or constrained system that primarily needs a clear view of evidence readiness.
LeftOut Security finds what other AI security reviews left out. We independently assess an agent’s authority, blast radius, architecture, controls, and evidence—without selling the remediation.
Corporate promise: threats hide in the identities, dependencies, permissions, tools, and assumptions other reviews left out.
Challenge the problem, test the ordinary-software alternative, and find the minimum useful AI before you add security cost and attack surface.
Run the 60-Second AI CheckThe right route is determined after a non-sensitive consultation. Scope, fee, evidence requirements, and schedule are confirmed in writing. No website action creates an engagement or authorizes testing.
A bounded baseline for an early or constrained system that primarily needs a clear view of evidence readiness.
For meaningful write access, privileged integrations, external action, persistent memory, cross-system reach, or weak containment.
For multiple trust boundaries, models, RAG, MCP servers, APIs, identities, data stores, or complex control dependencies.
For enterprise review, procurement, diligence, regulated requirements, or leadership decisions requiring independent inspection.
The final package connects evidence to system reach, credible failure paths, and an explicit decision. This preview shows the information structure without exposing client data or private assessment material.
Identities, data, tools, approvals, and downstream actions are shown in one traceable path.
Every material conclusion shows what supports it and where uncertainty remains.
The report states the decision, its conditions, accountable owners, and what evidence could change it.
Illustrative information architecture only—not a client report, certification, guarantee, or assessment outcome.
This work is designed for teams facing a real launch, buyer, governance, or investment decision—not for every prototype that happens to use an LLM.
The assurance method keeps system boundaries, authority, missing controls, evidence quality, exposure paths, and decision logic visible. It supports professional judgment; it does not replace it.
LeftOut Security assesses. It does not sell implementation, managed security, certification, or an endless remediation engagement.
Your team or chosen implementation partner owns the fix. Any follow-up review is defined in writing and kept separate from remediation work.
More than 15 years across security operations, cloud security, vulnerability management, security architecture, and NIST-aligned governance in enterprise, regulated, and federal environments—now focused on how AI systems inherit authority and create business exposure.
About the ReviewerEvery final conclusion is reviewed and signed by Tom. AI may assist with evidence organization and analysis; it does not issue the assessment.
Many focused assessments can be completed in roughly ten business days once the scope, evidence, and responsible owners are ready. Larger or unusually privileged systems receive a schedule that matches the actual work.
Confirm the system, business trigger, authorization, handling terms, evidence, fee, and schedule.
Architecture, identities, data, tools, authority, and action paths.
Evidence review, abuse paths, control validation, and unknowns.
Founder review, signed report, trust brief, roadmap, and executive readout.
Send a short, non-sensitive overview. If the assessment is a fit, the next step is a focused consultation and a written scope. If it is not, LeftOut Security will say so directly.